· Databricks
From PoC to Production: Why Governance Matters for GenAI on Databricks
Over the last couple of years, I’ve seen many organisations successfully build GenAI proofs of concept on Databricks — and then struggle when it comes time to move those solutions into production.

Over the last couple of years, I’ve seen many organisations successfully build GenAI proofs of concept on Databricks — and then struggle when it comes time to move those solutions into production.
The reason is rarely the model.
In regulated enterprise environments, architecture is often the easy part. Governance is where most GenAI programs slow down or fail entirely.
This article shares some real-world lessons from designing and operating production-grade GenAI platforms on Databricks, particularly in environments with strong security, compliance, and audit requirements.
PoC vs Production: The Reality Gap
GenAI PoCs usually work because:
- Data volumes are small
- Access is loosely controlled
- Costs are not closely monitored
- Evaluation is informal or manual
Production changes everything:
- Multiple teams and users are involved
- Data sensitivity increases
- Costs become visible very quickly
- Outputs must be explainable and auditable
This is where governance stops being optional.
Why Architecture Is Not the Hard Part
Databricks makes it relatively straightforward to assemble the core GenAI building blocks:
- Lakehouse storage with Delta Lake
- Scalable compute for embeddings and inference
- Integration with vector search and RAG pipelines
From an architectural perspective, most teams can get something working fairly quickly.
What’s harder is answering questions like:
- Who owns the data, embeddings, and prompts?
- Who can access which models — and why?
- How do we audit outputs?
- How do we know the system is still behaving correctly over time?
These are governance problems, not model problems.
Governance Challenges That Block GenAI Production
1. Ownership (The Most Common Issue)
One of the first issues that appears in production is unclear ownership.
Teams ask:
- Who owns the embeddings?
- Who owns the prompt templates?
- Who is accountable for model outputs?
Without clear ownership, even small changes become risky.
This is where Unity Catalog becomes critical — not just for data, but for establishing clear accountability across the GenAI lifecycle.
2. Access Control and Auditability
In early PoCs, access is often broad:
- “Let everyone try it”
- “We’ll lock it down later”
In production, this quickly becomes a problem.
Enterprises need:
- Fine-grained access control
- Clear lineage from input → output
- Audit trails for compliance and incident response
GenAI systems that cannot explain who accessed what and when rarely make it past governance reviews.
3. Evaluation and Hallucination Risk
Another common assumption is:
“If it works today, it will work tomorrow.”
In practice:
- Data changes
- Prompts evolve
- Models are updated
- Retrieval quality degrades over time
Without continuous evaluation, teams lose confidence in GenAI outputs.
Production GenAI requires:
- Retrieval quality checks
- Output validation
- Ongoing monitoring — not one-off testing
4. Cost Visibility Comes Late (and Painfully)
Many teams only discover GenAI cost issues after going live.
By then:
- Usage has already scaled
- Optimisation is harder
- Stakeholder confidence drops
Cost governance needs to be designed from day one, not added after the fact.
How Databricks Helps
What works well in Databricks is not just the technology, but how the pieces fit together:
- Unity Catalog for ownership, access, and auditability
- Lakehouse architecture for unified data and AI workloads
- Native support for observability and evaluation patterns
- Flexibility to evolve models without rebuilding the platform
Databricks provides the building blocks — but how you assemble them determines whether GenAI stays a PoC or becomes production-ready.
What Worked for Us
A few lessons that consistently helped:
- Define ownership early — before scaling usage
- Treat GenAI outputs as governed assets
- Build evaluation into the pipeline, not as an afterthought
- Monitor cost and usage continuously
- Design for auditability from day one
None of these are glamorous — but all of them matter.
Final Thought
GenAI success in the enterprise is less about choosing the best model and more about building trustworthy systems that can operate safely at scale.
Governance isn’t a blocker — it’s what enables GenAI to move from experimentation to real business value.
More writing

· Databricks
Databricks Temporary Tables (Public Preview) — What It Is and Why
Databricks just introduced Temporary Tables in SQL — now available in public preview on SQL warehouses — and it’s a simple but powerful addition to the Lakehouse toolkit that makes working with intermediate session da…


· IoT
Why Azure IoT Edge Is a Favourite Platform for Edge Computing
Azore IoT Edge service is built on top of IoT hub. The service is useful because you don’t need to send the data to cloud for analyzing it, instead you can analyze it on the device itself, that’s why it’s called “at t…